Monday, September 13, 2010

'Rape culture' made her lie and almost destroy five innocent men

We could have run our massive Hofstra piece over the course of a week, but decided that it would be better to put it in one place and let folks read it as they have time.  If you are going to read one thing on this site, read this: "Lambs To The Slaughter."  Buried deep in the article is a discussion of the lunatic fringe's reaction to the Hofstra case. I thought it would prove interesting to our readers to highlight our discussion of this article:

Hofstra was a blow to the radical feminist metanarrative that women don't lie about rape, and that men get away with rape with impunity. But progressive pundits weren't prepared to cede the mantle of victimhood to four unruly young males. Amanda Hess of the Washington City Paper's Sexist blog noted that "the public will likely never know what actually happened" in this case. This, despite the fact that the public knew within days of the event exactly what happened.

Then, Hess manufactured a handy excuse for Ndonye: "I can't recall how many times I've seen a discussion of a rape accusation devolve into the one side arguing why the accuser should be believed, and the other side arguing that the accuser should be discredited. . . . .The meaningless squabbles between the two camps tend to overlook the fact that people concerned about rape and people concerned about fake rape accusations are both fighting against the same thing: rape culture."

"Rape culture" is the cause of false rape claims? Really?

Wait. Hess isn't finished: "Both rape and rape accusations are products of the roles assigned by rape culture. In the traditional seduction scenario, a woman is expected to not desire to have sex, and to only submit after the man has successfully coerced her into submission. When the preferred model for consensual sex looks a hell of a lot like rape, an array of fucked-up scenarios are inevitable: the woman never wanted to fuck the guy, refuses to submit, and is raped; the woman submits to the man's coercion in order to avoid other negative consequences (like being raped); the woman had desired the sex all along, but must defend her femininity by saying that she had been coerced into sex."

Hess' epiphany is, of course, unworthy of serious consideration because it absolves false rape accusers of personal responsibility for their malefactions, whitewashes vile criminal misconduct, and enshrouds criminals bent on destroying innocent lives in the garb of victimhood.

Just as feminists are quick to condemn any suggestion that men are "too weak" to avoid raping, women must not be excused for destroying lives with rape lies merely because they've been taught to play "hard to get" or feel the need to "defend their femininity." Both men and women have the capacity to avoid committing terrible crimes, and it is a hallmark of a civilized society that people are held accountable when they fail to do so.

In any event, Hess' suggestion that it was some misogynistic and diabolical "rape culture" that made Ndonye regret her shocking sex frolic, or that kept her from trumpeting her bizarre tryst to the world, is stardust feminist wishfulness. Think, for a moment, about what really happened here. Ndonye's boyfriend was trying to call her at the very moment she was urging four strangers to insert their penises into her. The notion that Ndonye was merely "defending her femininity" by denying this particular consensual romp is absurd on its face. By any measure, she was cheating on her boyfriend in a nasty way -- there is no other way to spin it -- and she was rightfully ashamed for doing that. So she lied to cover it up.

The fact is, cheating lovers of both genders feel regret and don't want to be caught. It is well to note that one of the falsely accused young men in this case was greatly concerned about the need to explain to his girlfriend what he was doing in that bathroom. "I put her through hell," he said. "It's going to be hard to get through this." And, yes, if men could plausibly lie about rape to cover up illicit sex, no doubt many would do so, too. But while feelings of regret are not gender-specific, women have a near-monopoly on the power to plausibly cover up forbidden consensual sex with a rape lie.

Now go read the whole thing: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/p/lamb-to-slaughter-hofstra-false-rape.html

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Many young women today believe that falsifying a rape is a legitimate right of theirs.

After all, there is no such thing as false rape is there?

This twisted thinking comes from decades of academic feminist conditioning.

This has got to stop.

Chivalrous men in power must be voted out of office.

Falsifying a rape must become a Class A felony.

Talk to your local politicians, tell them how you feel, tell them that the legal system has got to stop treating false accusers as victims.

Anonymous said...

". . . . .The meaningless squabbles between the two camps tend to overlook the fact that people concerned about rape and people concerned about fake rape accusations are both fighting against the same thing: rape culture."

OhHOHOHOHOHAHAHAHAHAHAHHOHOHOHO!

Isn't that cute. The feminists have now stopped denying that false rape claims exist and want to recruit us to dig our own graves for them by buying into a mythical "rape culture" and submitting to an even heavier-handed attempt to curtail the free speech and legal behaviors of men and men alone than VAWA and IMBRA combined.

That is so cute. Unfortunately,honey, there's two things wrong with what you're saying, no "rape culture" actually exists and men aren't likely to help someone who is calling them a rapist.

It's actually funny. They want us to believe that it will stop false rape accusations if we accept a blanket false rape accusation from a group of people who considers all men rapists just because they have penises.

Cops have guns,bank robbers have guns, ergo cops rob banks.

Cats have tails,dogs have tails, ergo cats are dogs.

Men have penises,some rapists have penises,therefore "all men are rapists and that's all they are."

HAHAHAHAHAHA. Silly feminist.

It's called logic,honey, google it.


"Rape culture" theory is one giant false rape accusation and it's the theory of rape culture that needs to be fought,and the people who were twisted enough to devise it.

Don't try to talk your way out of this,feminists, women are going to pay for making false rape accusations. This WILL happen. Criminals will be punished. Rapists and false rape accusers alike.

Anonymous said...

The courts and judges are complicit partners in the false accusation claims.

They are guilty of a greater crime under the spirit of the crime of conspiracy.

What do you do when the law is unlawful?
-recluse-

Anonymous said...

"Since the men were cleared of all charges, the public will likely never know what actually happened during this “incident,”"

Putting aside that Amanda Hess has repeatedly proven herself to be an insane bigot...

Further putting aside that it was recorded on video, and that the accuser recanted -- nullifying the only "evidence" of rape...

We don't know what happened because the men were cleared of all charges?? That makes it unknowable?? But if they weren't cleared, then we can know it was rape??

Archivist said...

Anon at 10:14: Exactly right. But beyond that, the false accuser swore, under oath, that she made a false report. So we know what happened.

Anonymous said...

Sep 14, 2010 10:32:00 AM

But according to feminists like Amanda Hess, women never lie about rape, unless they recant. They were adamant a rape must have occurred because she said so, but her sworn statement under oath is meaningless because now she could be lying.

Archivist said...

"But according to feminists like Amanda Hess, women never lie about rape, unless they recant."

Feminists also teach that recantations are suspect. Women always tell the truth about rape -- except when they recant. Get it?

Anonymous said...

The most effective way to challenge the false rape culture that the Gender feminist / Law enforceemnt Alliance has fostered...is for society to deem this "Alliance" unconstitutional,and a perversion, and to seperate the two.